G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Godzilla, Hedorah, Mothra, Rodan... doesn't matter who your favorite Toho monster is, chances are you'll see them in our coming comics. C'mon in and get some good "flame wars" going.

Moderators: Bobby Curnow, Mowry

G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby lbh » Fri May 16, 2014 3:52 pm

I thought I'd post some online reviews on this thread. If you have any, your own, text reviews you've come across, whatever feel free to pile on :D This is from the Cinema Snob's Midnight reviews, where he and his friends review an early showing in the car at the theater. And note there are spoilers and, unlike the film this does have a post credit sequence :lol: http://www.thecinemasnob.com/midnight-s ... s-godzilla
lbh
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Sat May 17, 2014 9:38 am

Boston Herald:
‘Godzilla’ tries 
to save humanity 
in appalling reboot
James Verniere wrote:‘Godzilla” purists, count me among them, are going to be appalled by this “Godzilla” “reboot” from Legendary Pictures. This shaky-cam kaiju movie rewrites essential “Godzilla” mythology and makes the beast a giant reptilian superhero out to save the world, not destroy it.


I loved every minute of this movie.
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm


Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby lbh » Sat May 17, 2014 9:44 am

Here is Bum Review....I did say "the Ugly" :roll: http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videol ... 9-godzilla
lbh
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Sat May 17, 2014 9:54 am

LA Times:
Review For a monster, 'Godzilla' plays it a little too cool

LA Times:
'Godzilla' a solid if not smashing reboot, reviews say
Oliver Gettell wrote:The King of the Monsters is back in "Godzilla," Gareth Edwards' reboot of the iconic kaiju franchise starring Bryan Cranston, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen. While the big guy isn't getting the full royal welcome, most critics agree that the new "Godzilla" is a solid monster movie that honors its history — and that, yes, it's better than the 1998 version.
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Sat May 17, 2014 9:57 am

NY Times:
Still Radioactive and Spoiling for a Fight
Godzilla, Grandaddy of Movie Monsters, Stomps Back
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm



Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Sat May 17, 2014 10:11 am

The Good, The Bad and Godzilla:
MINI REVIEW: GARETH EDWARDS' "GODZILLA"
Run, Do Not Walk to See This King of Monsters!
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby lbh » Sat May 17, 2014 10:18 pm

Comics reviewer Linkara and two friends do a V-log http://atopfourthwall.blogspot.com/2014 ... zilla.html
lbh
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby lbh » Tue May 20, 2014 10:13 am

This one is from Angry Joe, I don't fully agree with him but he has some fun clips and bits in his review :) http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/bt/aj/ ... lla-review
lbh
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby lbh » Wed May 21, 2014 11:08 pm

This is a review from thatguywithglasses web site The guy on the right also did the Bum Review :) http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videol ... y-godzilla
lbh
I'm kind of a big deal
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Thu May 22, 2014 4:53 pm

oregon live:
'Godzilla' rips off Spielberg; the greatest cinematographer of the 1970s
slate:
The Best Spielberg Blockbuster in Years
How Godzilla director Gareth Edwards cloned the formula behind Jaws, Close Encounters, and Jurassic Park.

LA Times:
'Godzilla's' monstrous costars: What do MUTOs mean for the franchise?

'Godzilla': 5 Things Roland Emmerich's 1998 Version Did Better

buzzfeed:
Hollywood’s Big Gamble On Untested Directors Is Finally Paying Off
Godzilla, only the second film directed by Gareth Edwards, opened with $93.2 million. It’s one of the best-ever debuts for a filmmaker who’s never made a studio movie before.

Adam B. Vary wrote:Godzilla rampaged through theaters this weekend, grossing an estimated $93.2 million, by far the best domestic debut for a Godzilla movie in the creature’s 60-year history. Success on this scale with such a venerated cinema icon would be a triumph for any filmmaker, but it is especially sweet for Godzilla’s director, Gareth Edwards. It’s only the second feature film he’s ever made, and the first with a studio budget — or a budget of any kind, really.

Edwards’ first film, 2010’s Monsters, won wide acclaim for wringing a taut, human-scaled monster movie from a reported $500,000 budget. Edwards not only directed that independently financed film, but also served as its writer, cinematographer, production designer, and sole visual effects artist.

Monsters grossed just $237,000 in the United States, and another $4 million internationally, but Edwards’ work caught the attention and respect of many within Hollywood. Just a few years ago, that would have been enough to land Edwards a gig at a studio directing a mid-budget, low-stakes thriller to prove himself capable of marshaling the small army necessary for a modern Hollywood production.

Instead, Legendary Pictures chief Thomas Tull — who produced Godzilla and co-financed it with Warner Bros. Pictures — chose to hand Edwards a reported $160 million budget and one of the most esteemed creative properties in cinema history, announcing his decision with high-profile panache at Comic-Con in 2012. It was an enormous gamble, especially considering that Godzilla’s monumental place in popular culture has never been reflected all that well at the American box office. (The less said of Roland Emmerich’s 1998 Godzilla, the better.)

Tull is not alone with this particular gamble, either. Studios have of late given the reins of mega-budgeted, high-stakes movies to truly untested filmmakers who have never before directed a Hollywood production, let alone one with a budget pushing well past $100 million. Sony did it with Marc Webb and its The Amazing Spider-Man reboot — Webb’s only previous feature credit was the well-received indie romance (500) Days of Summer. Warner Bros. did it with Noam Murro and 300: Rise of an Empire — Murro had only made the rather forgotten 2008 indie comedy Smart People. For 2012’s Snow White and the Huntsman and 2010’s TRON: Legacy, Universal and Disney respectively hired commercial directors with zero feature film experience: Rupert Sanders and Joseph Kosinski.



These directors come cheaper than more well-established filmmakers (from Christopher Nolan and Tim Burton to Zack Snyder and Michael Bay), and they are never close to being the most powerful person on the set. The results have been reasonable, if not overwhelming: Each of the resulting films performed modestly well at the box office, neither bankrupting the studio (thanks often to overseas revenues) nor breaking anything close to a significant box office record. Critical response has also been rather muted; the general consensus has been praise for each film’s sense of visual style mixed with censure for underdeveloped stories and characters and under-directed acting. (Reviews of Godzilla have been much the same.)

Sometimes, however, things have not even gone that well for a rookie director, like with 2014’s Robo-Cop (from Brazilian director José Padilha), 2013’s 47 Ronin (from commercial director Carl Rinsch), and 2012’s John Carter (from Pixar filmmaker Andrew Stanton, who was making his live-action debut). Each of those films reportedly suffered from their respective director’s inexperience with managing the ungainly bloat of a mega-budgeted movie, resulting in bad press and an even worse box office.

Tellingly, the studio that has had the best luck with (relatively) untested directors has been Marvel Studios, which has something of a fixation with hiring directors with little experience at the helm of hugely scaled productions. The operative word here, however, is “little,” not “zero.” Anthony and Joe Russo may not have ever made an action film at the scale of Captain America: The Winter Soldier, but they had a studio comedy (2006’s Me, You, and Dupree) under their belt, as well as many episodes of comedies like Arrested Development and Happy Endings.

Alan Taylor made his feature directing debut with Thor: The Dark World, but he’d also directed several episodes of HBO’s Game of Thrones (as well as The Sopranos and Deadwood), so he certainly knew from orchestrating sprawling productions. Shane Black had only directed 2005’s action comedy Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang before making Iron Man 3, but he was also the screenwriter of several of the biggest movies of the late 1980s and early 1990s (especially the Lethal Weapon films) — he understood the rhythms and spectacle needed for a Hollywood action movie. And, of course, while Joss Whedon’s only previous feature was the modestly budgeted Serenity in 2005, he’d put in many years directing episodes of Firefly, Angel, and Buffy the Vampire Slayer — there were few filmmakers alive better equipped to handle the tangled ensemble of The Avengers.

With Hollywood making fewer and fewer smaller-scaled “proving ground” movies, it is perhaps an inevitable development than more and more films at the scale of Godzilla will be given to filmmakers who have never attempted directing anything like it before. Case in point: Disney’s Maleficent, the feature directing debut of visual effects artist and production designer Robert Stromberg (Avatar, Oz the Great and Powerful), debuts later this month. And so far this year, it appears to be working: The top three biggest opening weekends of 2014 — Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Godzilla, and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 — were all made by directors with precious few credits to their name.
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Fri May 30, 2014 12:30 am

Godzilla and MUTOs vs. birds and newts:
Reasons why the creatures in Godzilla (2014) are (sort of) plausible
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: G 14 Reviews, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Postby Mr.Negativity » Sat May 31, 2014 9:57 pm

The Dissolve:
Godzilla: The first post-human blockbuster
David Ehrlich wrote:In Gareth Edwards’ Godzilla, point of view is everything. Here is a $160 million studio tentpole in which perspective stomps over plot, and characters are defined not by their actions, but by their insignificance. Here is a confidently paced monster movie that eschews the “four action setpieces strung together with exposition and iced with a tease” template of contemporary blockbuster cinema. Edwards devotes the film’s first hour to the deepening tragedy of a single family, and builds to an unspeakably spectacular climax that’s less dependent on what we’re seeing than on how we’re seeing it.


MTV:
This One Shot Proves That The New ‘Godzilla’ Is Genius
Kevin P. Sullivan wrote:In the weeks since I’ve seen “Godzilla,” I’ve been vocal about my appreciation of it. I think it’s brilliant. Gareth Edwards managed to make a ’60s-style monster movie with a modern blockbuster budget, and he made it even better by barely showing the creature during the film’s first half.
User avatar
Mr.Negativity
Transforumer
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:32 pm

Next

Return to Godzilla and the Toho Monsters

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests